本文為作者對今年8月逝世的美國著名翻譯家尤金·奈達的懷念文章。作者回憶了與奈達相識后32年中的幾次交往，表達了作者的緬懷之情。奈達的翻譯理論，在中國以“翻譯科學(xué)”、“動態(tài)對等”和“讀者反應(yīng)”3點最為著名，影響最大，也最有爭議，作者梳理和回顧了國內(nèi)對奈達的這3個概念的誤讀和誤判，指出，“某個翻譯理論的提出，一般都會有其語境性、特殊性和針對性。反過來，任何好的理論，不管它有何語境性、特殊性或針對性，一般也都同時會有它的合理性、普適性和超時空性”。“當(dāng)我們在肯定或贊揚奈達的理論時，我們需要意識到它可能存在的局限和不足，不要盲從；而當(dāng)我們在批評它的局限或不足時，卻又不能妄加指責(zé)，把那些本來合理、優(yōu)勝的部分也否定掉。尤其是，有些人在后言必稱奈達時期，常常對奈達的一些核心理論橫加批評、甚至徹底否定，如對他的動態(tài)對等論和讀者反應(yīng)論，可是他們又不拿出、或拿不出可以用來替代的更好的理論。對此，大家是需要忌諱的。”
奈達翻譯理論研究》對奈達的翻譯理論作了較為全面、系統(tǒng)的研究，對譯界對它的研究狀況和接受情況進行了梳理、分析，澄清了譯界對奈達理論的種種錯誤認識，探討了譯界圍繞奈達理論進行的論爭及其根源。《奈達翻譯理論研究》以奈達理論指導(dǎo)下的(現(xiàn)代英文圣經(jīng))和(現(xiàn)代中文圣經(jīng))中的諸多譯例論證了奈達理論對翻譯實踐，尤其是對外漢翻譯實踐的指導(dǎo)意義，證明了我國譯界認為奈達理論不適合外漢翻譯的觀點是錯誤的�！赌芜_翻譯理論研究》對奈達理論和金隉理論的異同之處及其原因進行了深入探討，對金譯<尤利西斯)的得與失進行了分析，證明了奈達理論能夠指導(dǎo)莢漢文學(xué)翻譯實踐�！赌芜_翻譯理論研究》對奈達理論在漢英文學(xué)翻譯實踐中的局限性進行了有益探索，指出了奈達理論在文學(xué)作品的美學(xué)價值的再現(xiàn)上存在不足，并從美的形式特征和非形式特征兩個方面闡明文學(xué)翻譯如何再現(xiàn)原作美學(xué)價值的問題。
~CHAPI.ER ONE INTRoDUCTION
1.1 REASONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH oN NIUA'S TRANSLATION THEORY
1.2 A PROFILEOFNIDA
1.2.1 Nida's Earlier Study
1.2.2 His Involvement in the American Bihie Society
1.2.3 His Academic Contributions to Modern Linguistics and
Translation Theory
1.2.4 Nida's Association with Chinese Translation Scholars
1.3 A SURVEY OF NIDA'S TRANSLATION THEORY
1.3.1 Nida's Scientific Study of Tran~~ating
1.3.2 The Principle of Dynamic Equivalence
1.4 THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF THE RESEARCH
1.5 THE METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
CHAPTER TWO REVlEWS OF NID A.S TRANSLATIoN THEORY
2.1 A SURVEY OF CHINESE TRADITIONAL TRANSLATION THEORY BEFORE THE 1980S
2.1.1 Debate over Literal and Free Translation ln Buddhist Translation
2.1.2 Translation Principles in the Late Qing Dynasty
2.1.3 The Dehares on"Fairbdufness"versus"Sraoothness" in the 1930s
2.1.4 Translation Criteria Acknowledged from the 1940s to the 1960s
2.1.5 Translation Studies During the"Cultural Revolution"
2.1.6 The Features of Chinese Traditional Translation theories
2.2 NIDAS TRANSLATION THEoRY IN CHINA
2.2.1 Popularity of Nidgs Theory from 1981 to the Late 1980s
2.2.2 Rethinking Nida's Theory from the Late 1980s through the Mid-1990s
2.2.3 Denial of Nida's Theory from the Mid-1990s to the Present Time
2.2.4 Problems in the Studies of Nidgs Theory in China
2.3 AN OVERVIEW oF WESTERN TRANSLATION THEORIES REFORE NIDA
2.3.1 Early Statements on Translation During the Period of Roman Empire
2.3.2 From the Renaissance to the Eighteenth Century
2.3.3 The Nineteenth Century
2.3.4 The First Half of the Twentieth Century
2.4 NIDAS TRANSLATloN THEORY IN THE WESTERN WORLD
2.4.1 Influence ofNida'sTheory
2.4.2 Criticism of Nida's Theory
2.4.3 Rejection ofNidgsTheory
2 4.4 Problems in the Studies of Nidgs Theory in the West
CHAPTER THREE A STUDY ON NIDA'S TRANSLATl0N THEORY
3.1 NIDRS VIEWS OF LANGUAGE AND CULTURE
3.1.1 NidgsView of Language
3.1.2 Nida'sView ofCulture
3.2 NIDAS SCIENCE oF TRANSLAIoN
3.2.1 The Nature of Nida's Science of Translation
3.2.2 The Distorted"Science of Translation"in China
3.2.3 Nida's Science of Translation and ChomskCs TG Grammar
3.3 NIDAS CONCEPT OF TRANSLATloN EQUIVALENCE
3.3.1 Translation Equivalence in Western Countries
3.3.2 Translation Equivalence in China
3.3.3 Nida's Concept of Equivalence
3.4 DYNAMIC EQUIVALENCE/FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENCE
3.4.1 Phase I Dynamic Equivalence and Formal Equivalence
3.4.2 Phase II Dynamic Equivalence and Formal Correspondence
3.4.3 Phase III:Functional Equivalence and Formal Correspondence
3.5 CONTROVERSIES oVER DYNAMIC EQUIVALENCE/FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENCE
3.5.1 Dynamic Equivalence and Reader-Response Theory
3.5.2 Content and Form
3.5.3 Naturalization and Foreignization
3.6 TESTING NInA'S THEORY WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO BIBLE TRANSLATIoN
3.6.1 The History of Bible Translation into English
3.6.2 Testing Nidgs Theory with Examples from Today's English Version
3.6.2.1 Translating Idioms
3.6.2.2 Reconstructing Formal Structures
3.6.2.3 Translating Figurative Expressions
3.6.2.4 Making Explicit Implicit Information
3.6.3 The History of Bible Translation into Chinese
3.6.4 Testing Nidgs Theory with Examples from Todays Chinese Version
3.6.4.1 Translating Idioms
3.6.4.2 Reconstructing Formal Structures
3.6.4.3 Translating Figurative Expressions
3.6.4 4 Making Implicit Information Explicit
3.6 5 Problems in the TEV andtheTCV
CHAPTER FOUR A CoMPARATIVE STUDY OF NIDA'S THEORY AND JIN DI'S THEORY
4.1 JIN DI'S TRANSLATl0N THEORY
4.1.1 A Survey of Jin's Translation Activity and Translation Study
4.1.2 Jin's View on Translation Before His Reception of Nida's Theory
4.1.3 Jin's Theory of Equivalent Ef~~ct and Its Relationship with Nida's Theory
4.2 RETHINKING NIDA'S DYNAMIC EQUIVALENCE
4.2.1 The Relationship between Dynamic Equivalence and the Principle of Equivalent Effect
4.2.2 The Scientific Basis of Dynamic Equivalence/Functional Equivalence
4.2 3 The Immediate Concern of Dynamic Equivalence
4.3 JIN'S RoLE IN PoPULARIZING NIDA'S THEORY
4.3.1 Jin's Contribution to a Better Understanding of Nida's Theory
4.3.2 Problems with Some of Jin's Views about Nida's Theory
4.4 DIFFERENCE BETwEEN JIN'S THEoRY AND NIDA'S THEORY
4.4.1 Reader-Oriented vs Text-Oriented
4.4.2 Flexible vs Inflexible
4.4.3 Ideal Objective vs Realistic Goal
4.4.4 Reasons for the Differences between Jin's Theory and Nida's Theory
4.5 COMMENT ON JIN'S CHINESE VERSION OF ULYSSES
4.5.1 Successful Representation of Stream of Consciousness
4.5.2 Successful Representation of Normal Narratives
4.5.3 Problems in Jin's Chinese Version of Ulysses
4.5.4 Implications of Jin's Translation Practice for the Applicability of Nida's Theory to Literary Translation
CHAPTER FIVE ATIlEMPTS TD FURTHER AMEND NIDAS TRANSLATlON THEORY
5.1 THE APPLICATIONOF NIDAS THEORY TO LITERARY
TRANSLATIoN
5.1.1 The Application of Dynamic Equivalence
5.1.2 The Significance of the Concept of the Decoder's Channel Capacity
5.1.3 The Important Role Receptors Play in Evaluating Literary Translation
5.2 THE LIMITATIoNS OF NIDAS THEORY IN LITERARY TRANSLATION
5.3 THE IMPORTANCE OF TRANSFERRING AESrHETIC VALUES IN LITERARY TRANSLATl0N
5.4 TRANSFERRING AESTHETIC VALUES IN LITERARY TRANSLATION
5.4.1 Transferring Formal Aesthetic Mafres
5.4.2 Transferring Non-formal Aesthetic Markers
5.4.3 Transferring Aesthetic Values of a Literary Text as a Whole
5.5 TESTING THE REPRESENTATION OF AESTHETIC VALUES IN LITERARY TRANSLATION
5.5.1 Objective Factors Partiality of Translation
5.5.2 Subjective Factors the Translator and the Reader
5.5.3 Questionnaire Analysis of Literary Translation
CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION
NOTES
APPENDIX
BIBLIOGRAPHY~

Unitrans世聯(lián)翻譯公司在您身邊,離您近的翻譯公司,心貼心的專業(yè)服務(wù),專業(yè)的全球語言翻譯與信息解決方案供應(yīng)商,專業(yè)翻譯機構(gòu)品牌。無論在本地,國內(nèi)還是海外,我們的專業(yè)、星級體貼服務(wù)，為您的事業(yè)加速！世聯(lián)翻譯公司在北京、上海、深圳等國際交往城市設(shè)有翻譯基地，業(yè)務(wù)覆蓋全國城市。每天有近百萬字節(jié)的信息和貿(mào)易通過世聯(lián)走向全球！積累了大量政商用戶數(shù)據(jù)，翻譯人才庫數(shù)據(jù)，多語種語料庫大數(shù)據(jù)。世聯(lián)品牌和服務(wù)品質(zhì)已得到政務(wù)防務(wù)和國際組織、跨國公司和大中型企業(yè)等近萬用戶的認可。 專業(yè)翻譯公司,北京翻譯公司,上海翻譯公司,英文翻譯,日文翻譯,韓語翻譯,翻譯公司排行榜,翻譯公司收費價格表,翻譯公司收費標(biāo)準,翻譯公司北京,翻譯公司上海。